Stephen Baker, Jr. v. Superintendent Fayette SCI, et al
Defendant / Appellee: DISTRICT ATTORNEY HUNTINGDON COUNTY, SUPERINTENDENT FAYETTE SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff / Appellant: STEPHEN FREDERICK BAKER, JR.
Case Number: 19-2800
Filed: August 5, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 3, 2019 CLERK ORDER granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis by Appellant Stephen Frederick Baker, Jr. The Court may reconsider in forma pauperus status or request additional information at any time during the course of these proceedings, filed. (TMK) [Entered: 09/03/2019 11:38 AM]
August 19, 2019 MOTION filed by Appellant Stephen Frederick Baker, Jr. to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (PDB) [Entered: 08/23/2019 10:33 AM]
August 19, 2019 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Stephen Frederick Baker, Jr., filed. (PDB) [Entered: 08/23/2019 10:34 AM]
August 9, 2019 ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellees Attorney General Pennsylvania, District Attorney Huntingdon County and Superintendent Fayette SCI to Legal Division letter advising submitted for certificate of appealability. Certificate of Service dated 08/09/2019. [19-2800] (CJS) [Entered: 08/09/2019 03:49 PM]
August 9, 2019 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case will be submitted to a panel of this Court for a decision on the issuance of certificate of appealability. (JW) [Entered: 08/09/2019 03:14 PM]
August 9, 2019 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Christopher J. Schmidt on behalf of Appellee(s) Superintendent Fayette SCI, et al.. [19-2800] (CJS) [Entered: 08/09/2019 12:46 PM]
August 5, 2019 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (PDB) [Entered: 08/05/2019 03:45 PM]
August 5, 2019 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Stephen Frederick Baker, Jr. in District Court No. 1-16-cv-02478. (PDB) [Entered: 08/05/2019 03:38 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Stephen Baker, Jr. v. Superintendent Fayette SCI, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DISTRICT ATTORNEY HUNTINGDON COUNTY
Represented By: Christopher J. Schmidt Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SUPERINTENDENT FAYETTE SCI
Represented By: Christopher J. Schmidt Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Represented By: Christopher J. Schmidt Esq.
Represented By: Ronald Eisenberg Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: STEPHEN FREDERICK BAKER, JR.
Represented By: Stephen Frederick Baker Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?