Joseph Nicholson v. Superintendent Laurel Highland, et al
Defendant / Appellee: SUPERINTENDENT LAUREL HIGHLANDS SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY CHESTER COUNTY
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOSEPH CLAYTON NICHOLSON
Case Number: 19-2856
Filed: August 14, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 2, 2019 Additional Exhibits to the Certificate of Appealability. Certificate of Service dated 10/03/2019. Service made by ECF. (KR) [Entered: 10/03/2019 04:36 PM]
September 27, 2019 Exhibits to the Certificate of Appealability filed by Appellant Joseph Clayton Nicholson. Certificate of Service dated 10/02/2019. Service made by ECF. (KR) [Entered: 10/02/2019 03:14 PM]
September 6, 2019 MOTION filed by Appellant Joseph Clayton Nicholson for Certificate of Appealability. Response due on 09/19/2019. Certificate of Service dated 09/09/2019. Service made by ECF. (KR) [Entered: 09/09/2019 10:46 AM]
September 6, 2019 RESPONSE on behalf of Appellant Joseph Clayton Nicholson to Legal Division letter advising of possible dismissal, filed. Certificate of Service dated 09/09/2019. Service made by ECF. (KR) [Entered: 09/09/2019 10:35 AM]
August 16, 2019 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case will be submitted to a panel of this Court for a decision on the issuance of certificate of appealability AND for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (NF) [Entered: 08/16/2019 02:39 PM]
August 15, 2019 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Gerald P. Morano on behalf of Appellee(s) District Attorney's Office of Chester County, Superintendent Laurel Highland SCI, et al. [19-2856] (GPM) [Entered: 08/15/2019 11:44 AM]
August 14, 2019 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (KR) [Entered: 08/14/2019 08:07 AM]
August 14, 2019 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Joseph Clayton Nicholson in District Court No. 2-17-cv-00796. (KR) [Entered: 08/14/2019 08:01 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Joseph Nicholson v. Superintendent Laurel Highland, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SUPERINTENDENT LAUREL HIGHLANDS SCI
Represented By: Gerald P. Morano Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Represented By: Gerald P. Morano Esq.
Represented By: Ronald Eisenberg Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DISTRICT ATTORNEY CHESTER COUNTY
Represented By: Gerald P. Morano Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: JOSEPH CLAYTON NICHOLSON
Represented By: Joseph Clayton Nicholson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?