Charles Brown v. William Sprenkle, et al
| SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL D. KLOPOTOSKI, LORI LYONS, JEROME WALSH, TANYA BRANDT, VINCENT MOONEY and WILLIAM D. SPRENKLE |
| CHARLES EDWARD BROWN |
| 19-3200 |
| October 2, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Charles Brown v. William Sprenkle |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER (Clerk) Appellant's second motion to proceed in forma pauperis, reply to response to motion to proceed in forma pauperis and second prisoner account statement are referred to the same motions panel that will consider the previously filed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, documents in support, prisoner account statement, and response. (CJG) [Entered: 11/01/2019 02:45 PM]
|
| SECOND PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Mr. Charles Edward Brown, filed. (SB) [Entered: 10/29/2019 02:03 PM] |
| Reply by Appellant Mr. Charles Edward Brown to Appleee's Response, filed. Certificate of service dated 10/24/2019. Service made by US mail. (SB) [Entered: 10/29/2019 03:03 PM] |
|
ORDER (Clerk) referring to a motions panel the motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Mr. Charles Edward Brown, Documents in support of Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, Prisoner Account Statement and Response by Appellees to Motion for Leave tog File In Forma Pauperis. (SB) [Entered: 10/18/2019 09:30 AM]
|
| IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER AUTHORIZATION on behalf of Appellant Mr. Charles Edward Brown, filed. (SB) [Entered: 10/23/2019 03:30 PM] |
| IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER ADDENDUM on behalf of Appellant Mr. Charles Edward Brown, filed. (SB) [Entered: 10/23/2019 03:32 PM] |
| MOTION filed by to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Response due on 10/24/2019. Certificate of Service dated 10/11/2019. Service made by US mail. (SB) [Entered: 10/23/2019 03:46 PM] |
| ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellees Tanya Brandt, Michael D. Klopotoski, Lori Lyons, Vincent Mooney, William D. Sprenkle and Jerome Walsh to motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Certificate of Service dated 10/16/2019. [19-3200] (JGF) [Entered: 10/16/2019 09:23 AM] |
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Joseph Fulginiti on behalf of Appellee(s) William Sprenkle, Tanya Brandt, Michael Klopotoski, Vincent Mooney, Jerome Walsh, Lori Lyons. [19-3200] (JGF) [Entered: 10/15/2019 09:23 AM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Charles Edward Brown to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Response due on 10/21/2019. Certificate of Service dated 10/09/2019. Service made by ECF. (SLC) [Entered: 10/09/2019 09:55 AM] |
| IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER AUTHORIZATION on behalf of Appellant Mr. Charles Edward Brown, filed. (SLC) [Entered: 10/09/2019 09:57 AM] |
| Documents in Support of Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (SLC) [Entered: 10/09/2019 09:56 AM] |
| PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Mr. Charles Edward Brown, filed. (SLC) [Entered: 10/09/2019 09:58 AM] |
| CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE: Reviewed Bill of Costs entry from 10/3/19 ERROR: Event entered in incorrect case CORRECTION: docket entry will be removed from this docket and entered on the docket in correct case at 18-3550 THIS MESSAGE IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. (SB) [Entered: 10/04/2019 02:27 PM] |
| RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (LMR) [Entered: 10/02/2019 09:55 AM] |
| CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Charles Edward Brown in District Court No. 3-10-cv-02612. (LMR) [Entered: 10/02/2019 09:49 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
