Cases 1 - 10 of 212
Kelash v. Mille Lacs County et al
as 0:2022cv03057
Plaintiff:
Raymond-charles Kelash
Defendant:
Mille Lacs County, Tristen DeMotett, Don Lorge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelash v. Mille Lacs County et al
as 0:2022cv03051
Plaintiff:
Sharon-theresa Kelash
Defendant:
Mille Lacs County, Tristen DeMotett, Don Lorge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelash v. Mille Lacs County et al
as 0:2022cv02728
Plaintiff:
Raymond-charles Kelash
Defendant:
Mille Lacs County, Mark Reichel, Don Lorge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelash v. Mille Lacs County et al
as 0:2022cv02717
Plaintiff:
Sharon-theresa Kelash
Defendant:
Mille Lacs County, Tristen, Don Lorge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Charles Brown v. William Sprenkle, et al
as 19-3200
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL D. KLOPOTOSKI, LORI LYONS, JEROME WALSH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD BROWN
Howard Carter v. Kathleen Kane, et al
as 16-3731
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOWARD A. CARTER
Defendant:
KATHLEEN KANE, BRIAN COLEMAN, DARRELL O. DUGAN and others
Howard Carter v. Kathleen Kane, et al
as 16-3731
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOWARD A. CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN G. KANE, BRIAN COLEMAN, DARRELL O. DUGAN and others
In re: Ernest Woodall
as 15-3845
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: ERNEST WOODALL
Defendant - Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE, JEROME WALSH and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Nominal Respondent:
ROBERT D. MARIANI
Brown v. Lyons et al
as 3:2015cv01981
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Brown
Defendant:
Lori Lyons, Jerome Walsh, Vincent Mooney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sulaiman Taalibdin v. Jerome Walsh
as 14-3789
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SULAIMAN TAALIBDIN
Defendant - Appellee:
JEROME WALSH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
