Rogelio Carvajal Peraza v. Attorney General United States
| ROGELIO ANTONIO CARVAJAL PERAZA |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 19-3295 |
| October 7, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Jesse D. Lorenz on behalf of Respondent(s) U.S. Attorney General. [19-3295] (JDL) [Entered: 10/08/2019 11:55 AM] |
ORDER (Clerk) temporarily granting motion for stay of removal in accordance with the Standing Order of the Court dated August 5, 2015. Removal is stayed until such time as the Court can consider the motion for stay of removal, filed. (JK) [Entered: 10/07/2019 04:34 PM]
|
| MOTION filed by Petitioner Rogelio Antonio Carvajal Peraza to Stay Removal. Response due on 10/15/2019. Certificate of Service dated 10/01/2019. Service made by US mail. (JK) [Entered: 10/07/2019 04:31 PM] |
|
ORDER (Clerk) granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Rogelio Antonio Carvajal Peraza. (JK) [Entered: 10/07/2019 04:28 PM]
|
|
ORDER (Clerk) directing the Executive Office of Immigration Review to file the adminstrative record. (JK) [Entered: 10/07/2019 04:20 PM]
|
| MOTION filed by Petitioner Rogelio Antonio Carvajal Peraza to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (JK) [Entered: 10/07/2019 04:24 PM] |
| AGENCY CASE DOCKETED. Petition filed by Rogelio Antonio Carvajal Peraza. Certificate of Service dated 10/07/2019. Service made by ECF. (JK) [Entered: 10/07/2019 04:16 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
