Perry Burris v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: PERRY BURRIS
Defendant / Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Case Number: 19-3740
Filed: November 27, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER (Clerk) The foregoing motion is granted. Appellant's application for a certificate of appealability must be filed within sixty (60) days of the date of this order. If Appellant does not file an application for a certificate of appealability by the deadline established, Appellant's notice of appeal will be deemed to be such an application and will be submitted by the Clerk of this Court to a panel of the Court for consideration. See Fed. R. App. P. 22(b)(2). (SLC) [Entered: 01/06/2020 08:21 AM]
December 26, 2019 MOTION filed by Appellant Perry Burris to Extend Time to File Certificate of Aappealability until for 60 days. Response due on 01/02/2020. Certificate of Service dated 12/19/2019. Service made by US mail. (KR) [Entered: 12/27/2019 10:08 AM]
December 16, 2019 Notice received from district court that ifp has been granted to Appellant Perry Burris. (KR) [Entered: 12/16/2019 12:15 PM]
December 6, 2019 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Max C. Kaufman on behalf of Appellee(s) Supt. Mahanoy SCI; District Attorney of the County of Philadelphia; Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania. [19-3740] (MCK) [Entered: 12/06/2019 02:03 PM]
November 29, 2019 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case will be submitted to a panel of this Court for a decision on the issuance of certificate of appealability. (SH) [Entered: 11/29/2019 01:29 PM]
November 27, 2019 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Perry Burris in District Court No. 2-17-cv-02161. (SLC) [Entered: 11/27/2019 08:06 AM]
November 27, 2019 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (SLC) [Entered: 11/27/2019 08:07 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Perry Burris v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: PERRY BURRIS
Represented By: Perry Burris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Represented By: Max C. Kaufman Esq.
Represented By: Ronald Eisenberg Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI
Represented By: Max C. Kaufman Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Represented By: Max C. Kaufman Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?