Steven Gebhart v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
| COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| STEVEN DOUGLAS GEBHART |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY YORK COUNTY |
| 19-3937 |
| December 20, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Ronald Eisenberg, Esq. for Attorney General Pennsylvania and Stephanie E. Lombardo, Esq. for District Attorney York County requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 02/19/2020. (PDB) [Entered: 02/05/2020 10:57 AM] |
| Filing 11 LETTER from Appellant Steven Douglas Gebhart Regarding Motion filed in District Court. Service made on 02/06/2020 by ECF. (PDB) [Entered: 02/06/2020 12:10 PM] |
| Filing 9 Notice received from the district court that the docketing and filing fees were paid by the appellant on 01/23/2020. (PDB) [Entered: 01/23/2020 02:50 PM] |
| LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case will be submitted to a panel of this Court for a decision on the issuance of certificate of appealability. (NF) [Entered: 12/23/2019 04:50 PM] |
| RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (PDB) [Entered: 12/20/2019 03:35 PM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Steven Douglas Gebhart for Certificate of Appealability. Response due on 12/30/2019. Certificate of Service dated 12/17/2019. Service made by US mail. (PDB) [Entered: 12/23/2019 06:43 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Steven Douglas Gebhart in District Court No. 3-15-cv-01962. (PDB) [Entered: 12/20/2019 03:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
