Tola Ross v. Superintendent Pine Grove SCI, et al
| SUPERINTENDENT PINE GROVE SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA |
| TOLA ROSS |
| 19-3947 |
| December 20, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Tola Ross v. Superintendent Pine Grove SCI |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER (Clerk) granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Tola Ross. (MB) [Entered: 01/30/2020 11:42 AM]
|
| Filing 11 MOTION filed by Appellant Tola Ross to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Response due on 01/27/2020. Certificate of Service dated 01/17/2020. Service made by ECF. (MB) [Entered: 01/17/2020 01:49 PM] |
| STATE COURT RECORD returned. One folder. (LM) [Entered: 12/27/2019 10:57 AM] |
| STATE COURT RECORD received. One Folder. (LM) [Entered: 12/27/2019 10:51 AM] |
| LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case will be submitted to a panel of this Court for a decision on the issuance of certificate of appealability. (NF) [Entered: 12/23/2019 05:09 PM] |
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Michael R. Scalera on behalf of Appellee(s) Supt. Pine Grove SCI; District Attorney Philadelphia; Attorney General Pennsylvania. [19-3947] (MRS) [Entered: 12/23/2019 10:33 AM] |
| PARTIAL RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF.--[Edited 12/23/2019 by MB] (MB) [Entered: 12/20/2019 02:51 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by in District Court No. 2-17-cv-00073. (MB) [Entered: 12/20/2019 02:49 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
