Maurice Price v. Pennsylvania Board of Probatio, et al
| MAURICE M. PRICE |
| PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY BERKS COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA |
| 19-3968 |
| December 24, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER (Clerk) granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Maurice M. Price. (TMM) [Entered: 02/18/2020 09:20 AM]
|
| Filing 10 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Maurice M. Price. (TMM) [Entered: 02/10/2020 03:08 PM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION filed by Appellant Maurice M. Price to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Certificate of Service dated 02/04/2020. Service made by US mail. (TMM) [Entered: 02/10/2020 03:07 PM] |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE on behalf of Appellant Maurice M. Price to letter advising of possible dismissal. Certificate of Service dated 01/13/2020. Service made by US mail. (TMM) [Entered: 01/22/2020 03:45 PM] |
| Filing 7 ECF FILER: Sean A. Kirkpatrick NOT PARTICIPATING: Appellee Attorney General Pennsylvania will not participate in this appeal, received. [19-3968] (SAK) [Entered: 01/15/2020 02:57 PM] |
| LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (SH) [Entered: 12/26/2019 04:03 PM] |
| RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (TMM) [Entered: 12/24/2019 11:18 AM] |
| CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Maurice M. Price in District Court No. 5-19-cv-05263. (TMM) [Entered: 12/24/2019 11:16 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
