In re: Stuart Proper
Petitioner: In re: STUART J. PROPER
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, RICHARD A. LANZILLO and DISTRICT ATTORNEY VENANGO COUNTY
Case Number: 20-1129
Filed: January 21, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 29, 2020 Stuart Proper v.

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 21, 2020 Filing 2 NONCOMPLIANCE Order sent to Petitioner Stuart J. Proper requesting Petitioner must either file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affidavit or remit payment of the $500.00 filing fee. As required by the affidavit form and statute, the motion must be accompanied by a certified statement of Petitioner's institutional account for the six months prior to this date, It is noted that a petition for writ of mandamus is an original action and a separate motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis must be filed, regardless of Petitioner's fee status in other proceeding. If the filing fee is not paid or the motion not filed, the petition may be dismissed without further notice. See 3d Cir. L.A.R. Misc. 107.1. A copy of the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis must be served on each party to the proceeding, including the District Court judge. A certificate of service reflecting that the motion has been served must also be submitted to the Court of Appeals within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order. The petition will not be submitted to the Court until the filing fee or motion to proceed in forma pauperis is received, See Fed. R. App. P. 21(a)(3). Compliance due 02/04/2020. (TMM) [Entered: 01/21/2020 11:59 AM]
January 21, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DOCKETED. Notice filed by Petitioner Stuart J. Proper. (TMM) [Entered: 01/21/2020 11:40 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In re: Stuart Proper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: RICHARD A. LANZILLO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY VENANGO COUNTY
Represented By: D. Shawn White Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: STUART J. PROPER
Represented By: Stuart J. Proper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?