Abelardo Gomez-Ramirez v. Attorney General United States
ABELARDO GOMEZ-RAMIREZ, AKA Abelado Gomez-Ramirez |
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
20-1222 |
January 30, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Nicole J. Thomas-Dorris on behalf of Respondent(s) William P. Barr. [20-1222] (NT) [Entered: 01/31/2020 03:55 PM] |
Filing 6 ORDER (Clerk) Having been notified that Petitioner was removed prior to the issuance of the administrative stay, the temporary administrative stay entered on January 30, 2020 is hereby vacated. In addition, no action will be taken on Petitioners motion for stay of removal filed on January 30, 2020. (SB) [Entered: 01/31/2020 03:26 PM] |
Filing 4 ORDER (Clerk) directing the Executive Office of Immigration Review to file the adminstrative record. (KR) [Entered: 01/30/2020 04:58 PM] |
Filing 3 ORDER (Clerk) temporarily granting motion for stay of removal in accordance with the Standing Order of the Court dated August 5, 2015. Removal is stayed until such time as the Court can consider the motion for stay of removal. (KR) [Entered: 01/30/2020 04:55 PM] |
Filing 2 MOTION filed by Petitioner Abelardo Gomez-Ramirez to Stay Removal. Response due on 02/10/2020. Certificate of Service dated 01/30/2020. Service made by ECF. (KR) [Entered: 01/30/2020 04:54 PM] |
Filing 1 AGENCY CASE DOCKETED. Petition filed by Abelardo Gomez Ramirez. Certificate of Service dated 01/30/2020. Service made by ECF. (KR) [Entered: 01/30/2020 04:49 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.