Carl Robinson v. Superintendent Retreat SCI, et al
| CARL ROBINSON |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and SUPERINTENDENT RETREAT SCI |
| 20-1228 |
| January 31, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RESPONSE on behalf of Appellant Carl Robinson to Legal Division letter advising of possible dismissal and letter advising case will be submitted for certificate of appealability. Certificate of Service dated 02/26/2020. Service made by US mail. (TMM) [Entered: 03/04/2020 10:40 AM] |
| Filing 5 Certified copy of duplicate notice of appeal filed in the district court on 01/31/2020 received from Clerk of District Court. (TMM) [Entered: 02/11/2020 03:01 PM] |
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Jennifer O. Andress on behalf of Appellee(s) Supt. Retreat SCI; District Attorney Philadelphia; Attorney General Pennsylvania. [20-1228] (JOA) [Entered: 02/05/2020 02:09 PM] |
| Filing 3 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect., advising that the case will be submitted to a panel of this Court for a decision on the issuance of certificate of appealability. (SH) [Entered: 02/03/2020 11:42 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (KR) [Entered: 01/31/2020 03:41 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Carl Robinson in District Court No. 2-16-cv-04224. (KR) [Entered: 01/31/2020 03:37 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
