Foster Tarver v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
| DAUPHIN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA |
| FOSTER LEE TARVER |
| 20-1923 |
| May 4, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Reply to Response by Appellant Foster Lee Tarver to Motion for Certificate of Appealability., Certificate of service dated 05/21/2020. (MB) [Entered: 06/01/2020 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 6 ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellees Attorney General Pennsylvania and Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas to motion for certificate of appealability. Certificate of Service dated 05/06/2020. [20-1923] (RHL) [Entered: 05/06/2020 08:39 PM] |
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Ryan H. Lysaght on behalf of Appellee(s) Pennsylvania Attorney General, et al.. [20-1923] (RHL) [Entered: 05/06/2020 08:14 PM] |
| Filing 4 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case will be submitted to a panel of this Court for a decision on the issuance of certificate of appealability. (MW) [Entered: 05/05/2020 10:36 AM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION filed by Appellant Foster Lee Tarver for Certificate of Appealability. Response due on 05/11/2020. Certificate of Service dated 04/28/2020. Service made by US mail. (MB) [Entered: 05/04/2020 04:32 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (MB) [Entered: 05/04/2020 08:22 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Foster Lee Tarver in District Court No. 1-20-cv-00199. (MB) [Entered: 05/04/2020 08:15 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
