Ronald Dandar v. Superintendent Cresson SCI, et al
Defendant / Appellee: DISTRICT ATTORNEY ERIE COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, PROBATION & PAROLE, VIOLATION 4 and SUPERINTENDENT CRESSON SCI
Plaintiff / Appellant: RONALD G. DANDAR
Case Number: 20-2239
Filed: June 29, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER (Clerk) considering the foregoing motion. Insofar as a briefing schedule has yet to issue, no action will be taken on the request for an extension of time to file an informal brief. It is noted that this case will be submitted to a panel of the Court for consideration as to whether a certificate of appealability should issue. It is noted that Appellant has not filed an application for a certificate of appealability as of the date of this Order. If Appellant wishes to file an application for a certificate of appealability, the application must be filed within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order. No further extensions will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances. If Appellant does not file an application for a certificate of appealability by the deadline established, Appellant's notice of appeal will be deemed to be such an application and will be submitted by the Clerk of this Court to a panel of the Court for consideration. See Fed. R. App. P. 22(b)(2). To the extent Appellant requests to continue in forma pauperis status, the motion is granted. It is noted that Appellant retained in forma pauperis status from the District Court in this matter. No action will be taken on Appellant's request for leave to proceed on the original record as it is unnecessary. If the Court grants the application for a certificate of appealability, and Appellant is indigent, counsel will be appointed on behalf of the Appellant under the Criminal Justice Act, unless the Court instructs otherwise. See 18 U.S.C. Section 3006A(a)(2)(B); IOP 10.3.2. A briefing schedule would then be issued to counsel at the appropriate time. (ARR) [Entered: 08/26/2020 04:42 PM]
July 24, 2020 Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from John C. Manning, Esq. on behalf of Appellee(s) Supt. SCI-Cresson, District Attorney Erie County, Pennsylvania Parole Board. [20-2239] (JCM) [Entered: 07/24/2020 10:11 AM]
July 24, 2020 Filing 4 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Ronald Eisenberg, Esq. for Attorney General Pennsylvania, Lisa R. Ferrick, Esq. for District Attorney Erie County and John C Manning, Esq. for Attorney General Pennsylvania, Superintendent Cresson SCI and Probation & Parole requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 08/07/2020. (ARR) [Entered: 07/24/2020 09:19 AM]
July 21, 2020 Filing 6 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Ronald G. Dandar for 90-Day Extension of Time to File Informal Brief, to Continue In Forma Pauperis Status, and for Leave to Proceed on the Original Record. Certificate of Service dated 07/10/2020. Service made by US mail. (ARR) [Entered: 08/26/2020 04:38 PM]
July 7, 2020 Filing 3 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case will be submitted to a panel of this Court for possible summary action., AND advising that the case will be submitted to a panel of this Court for a decision on the issuance of certificate of appealability. (SH) [Entered: 07/07/2020 12:46 PM]
June 29, 2020 Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (ARR) [Entered: 06/29/2020 07:07 PM]
June 29, 2020 Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Ronald G. Dandar in District Court No. 1-11-cv-00042. (ARR) [Entered: 06/29/2020 07:02 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ronald Dandar v. Superintendent Cresson SCI, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DISTRICT ATTORNEY ERIE COUNTY
Represented By: Lisa R. Ferrick Esq.
Represented By: John C. Manning Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Represented By: John C. Manning Esq.
Represented By: Ronald Eisenberg Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PROBATION & PAROLE, VIOLATION 4
Represented By: John C. Manning Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SUPERINTENDENT CRESSON SCI
Represented By: John C. Manning Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: RONALD G. DANDAR
Represented By: Ronald G. Dandar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?