Magdaly Roman-Azanon, et al v. Attorney General United States
| F. G. T.R. and MAGDALY ELIZABETH ROMAN-AZANON |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 20-2657 |
| August 12, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Court of Appeals fee paid. Receipt No. A03-60199-310. Receipt dated 08/13/20. (KR) [Entered: 08/13/2020 04:10 PM] |
| Filing 6 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Julia J. Tyler on behalf of Respondent(s) William P. Barr. [20-2657] (JJT) [Entered: 08/13/2020 03:03 PM] |
Filing 5
ORDER (Clerk) temporarily granting motion for stay of removal in accordance with the Standing Order of the Court dated August 5, 2015. Removal is stayed until such time as the Court can consider the motion for stay of removal. (KR) [Entered: 08/13/2020 10:58 AM]
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER (Clerk) any future filings should be in compliance with L.A.R. 113.12 and the Judicial Conference Policy on Privacy. (KR) [Entered: 08/13/2020 10:54 AM]
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER (Clerk) directing the Executive Office of Immigration Review to file the adminstrative record. (KR) [Entered: 08/13/2020 10:44 AM]
|
| Filing 2 MOTION filed by Petitioners Magdaly Elizabeth Roman-Azanon and F. G. T.R. to Stay Removal. Response due on 08/24/2020. Certificate of Service dated 08/13/2020. Service made by ECF. (KR) [Entered: 08/13/2020 10:43 AM] |
| Filing 1 AGENCY CASE DOCKETED. Petition filed by Magdaly Elizabeth Roman-Azanon and F. G. T.R.. Certificate of Service dated 08/13/2020. Service made by ECF. (KR) [Entered: 08/13/2020 10:34 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
