Cipriano Rodriguez v. Attorney General United States
| CIPRIANO CARREON RODRIGUEZ |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 21-2230 |
| June 25, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION filed by Petitioner Cipriano Carreon Rodriguez to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Response due on 07/12/2021. Certificate of Service dated 07/01/2021. Service made by ECF. (SLC) [Entered: 07/01/2021 03:50 PM] |
| Filing 11 SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION filed by Petitioner Cipriano Carreon Rodriguez to Stay Removal. Response due on 07/12/2021. Certificate of Service dated 07/01/2021. Service made by ECF. (SLC) [Entered: 07/01/2021 03:49 PM] |
| Filing 10 Supplemental Petition for Review. (SLC) [Entered: 07/01/2021 03:47 PM] |
| Filing 9 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from John D. Williams on behalf of Respondent(s) Merrick B. Garland. [21-2230] (JDW) [Entered: 06/29/2021 10:07 AM] |
| Filing 8 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from John D. Williams on behalf of Respondent(s) Merrick B. Garland, United States Attorney General. [21-2230] (JDW) [Entered: 06/29/2021 10:01 AM] |
Filing 7
ORDER (Clerk) temporarily granting motion for stay of removal in accordance with the Standing Order of the Court dated August 5, 2015. Removal is stayed until such time as the Court can consider the motion for stay of removal. (TMM) [Entered: 06/29/2021 08:52 AM]
|
| Filing 6 MOTION filed by Petitioner Cipriano Carreon Rodriguez to stay removal. Response due on 07/12/2021. Certificate of Service dated 06/28/2021. Service made by US mail. (TMM) [Entered: 06/29/2021 08:51 AM] |
| Filing 5 Amended Petition for Review filed by Petitioner Cipriano Carreon Rodriguez.. Certificate of Service dated 06/28/2021. (TMM) [Entered: 06/28/2021 04:41 PM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER (Clerk) granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Cipriano Carreon Rodriguez. (TMM) [Entered: 06/28/2021 12:44 PM]
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER (Clerk) directing the Executive Office of Immigration Review to file the adminstrative record. (TMM) [Entered: 06/28/2021 12:38 PM]
|
| Filing 2 MOTION filed by Petitioner Cipriano Carreon Rodriguez to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Certificate of Service dated 06/25/2021. Service made by Email. (TMM) [Entered: 06/28/2021 12:38 PM] |
| Filing 1 AGENCY CASE DOCKETED. Petition filed by Cipriano Carreon Rodriguez. Certificate of Service dated 06/25/2021. Service made by Email. (TMM) [Entered: 06/28/2021 12:33 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Cipriano Rodriguez v. Attorney General United States | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: CIPRIANO CARREON RODRIGUEZ | |
| Represented By: | Cipriano Carreon Rodriguez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Represented By: | John D. Williams Esq. |
| Represented By: | Merrick B. Garland Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
