Amar Green v. Superintendent Huntingdon SCI, et al
| AMAR GREEN |
| SUPERINTENDENT HUNTINGDON SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA |
| 21-2403 |
| July 29, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER (Clerk) Action on the motion to proceed in forma pauperis is deferred pending the submission of an additional document. Appellant must submit a 6 month prision account statement within 14 days of the date of this order. (TMM) [Entered: 08/30/2021 12:04 PM]
|
| Filing 6 MOTION filed by Appellant Amar Green to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Certificate of Service dated 08/16/2021. Service made by US mail. (TMM) [Entered: 08/25/2021 10:03 AM] |
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from David Napiorski on behalf of Appellee(s) Supt. Huntingdon SCI; District Attorney Philadelphia; Attorney General Pennsylvania. [21-2403] (DN) [Entered: 08/02/2021 02:22 PM] |
| Filing 4 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect AND for the issuance of certificate of appealability. (MW) [Entered: 08/02/2021 12:40 PM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION filed by Appellant Amar Green for Certificate of Appealability. (AMR) [Entered: 07/29/2021 01:09 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (AMR) [Entered: 07/29/2021 01:01 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Amar Green in District Court No. 2-19-cv-02919. (AMR) [Entered: 07/29/2021 12:55 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
