Stacey Watson v. Attorney General United States
Petitioner: STACEY WATSON, Beneficiary Karnail Singh, A078-427-729
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 21-2977
Filed: October 25, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 27, 2021 Filing 8 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Respondent Attorney General United States of America for Extension of Time to file Response to Court's October 26, 2021 Order until/for 7 days. Certificate of Service dated 10/27/2021. Service made by ECF, US mail. [21-2977] (EKO) [Entered: 10/27/2021 07:56 AM]
October 26, 2021 Filing 7 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Elizabeth K. Ottman on behalf of Respondent(s) US Attorney General. [21-2977] (EKO) [Entered: 10/26/2021 11:51 AM]
October 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER (Clerk) directing the Executive Office of Immigration Review to file the adminstrative record. (LMR) [Entered: 10/26/2021 10:38 AM]
October 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER (Clerk) advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect.. (LMR) [Entered: 10/26/2021 10:37 AM]
October 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER (Clerk) It is noted that Petitioner provided confidential medical records in support of her petition for review. Petitioner also attaches additional confidential documents to her motion to proceed in forma papueris. These documents will be held provisionally under seal for fourteen (14) days. If Petitioner wishes to continue the seal of these documents, she must file a separate motion to seal no later than the 14-day deadline. The motion must identify the scope and basis for sealing and the desired duration of the sealing order. If Petitioner does not file the motion to seal by the deadline, the Clerk will unseal the documents on the docket. (LMR) [Entered: 10/26/2021 10:32 AM]
October 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER (Clerk) The foregoing motion is granted. The Court may reconsider in forma pauperis status or request additional information at any time during the course of these proceedings. (LMR) [Entered: 10/26/2021 10:26 AM]
October 25, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION filed by Petitioner Stacey Watson to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Certificate of Service dated 10/25/2021. Service made by US mail. (LMR) [Entered: 10/26/2021 10:21 AM]
October 25, 2021 Filing 1 AGENCY CASE DOCKETED. Petition filed by Stacey Watson, Beneficiary Karnail Singh, A078-427-729. Certificate of Service dated 10/25/2021. Service made by US mail. (LMR) [Entered: 10/26/2021 10:17 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Stacey Watson v. Attorney General United States
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: STACEY WATSON, Beneficiary Karnail Singh, A078-427-729
Represented By: Stacey Watson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Merrick B. Garland Esq.
Represented By: OIL
Represented By: Elizabeth K. Ottman Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?