Jonathan Pena Charles v. Attorney General United States
JONATHAN ABDIAS PENA CHARLES, AKA Jonathan Pena Williams |
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
21-3021 |
October 29, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Jonathan Pena Charles v. Attorney General United States |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ECF FILER: Response filed by Respondent Attorney General United States of America to motion to stay removal. Certificate of Service dated 11/02/2021. [21-3021] (RHP) [Entered: 11/02/2021 12:07 PM] |
Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Rebecca Hoffberg Phillips on behalf of Respondent(s) U.S. Attorney General. [21-3021] (RHP) [Entered: 11/01/2021 11:17 AM] |
Filing 4 ORDER (Clerk) directing the Executive Office of Immigration Review to file the adminstrative record. (LMR) [Entered: 11/01/2021 10:15 AM] |
Filing 3 ORDER (Clerk) temporarily granting motion for stay of removal in accordance with the Standing Order of the Court dated August 5, 2015. Removal is stayed until such time as the Court can consider the motion for stay of removal. (LMR) [Entered: 11/01/2021 10:10 AM] |
Filing 2 MOTION filed by Petitioner Jonathan Abdias Pena Charles to stay removal. Certificate of Service dated 10/29/2021. Service made by US mail. (LMR) [Entered: 11/01/2021 10:08 AM] |
Filing 1 AGENCY CASE DOCKETED. Petition filed by Jonathan Abdias Pena Charles. Certificate of Service dated 10/29/2021. Service made by US mail. (LMR) [Entered: 11/01/2021 10:05 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.