Ernest WoodallIn re: Ernest Woodall
| In re: ERNEST WOODALL |
| JEROME W. WALSH, Superintendant, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DAVID S. CERCONE |
| 22-1703 |
| April 18, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER (Clerk) Action on petition for mandamus is hereby deferred. Petitioner did not submit the filing fee or a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis with the mandamus petition. Within 14 days of the date of this order, Petitioner must either file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affidavit or remit payment of the $500.00 filing fee. A form affidavit is enclosed for Petitioner's convenience. As required by the affidavit form and statute, the motion must be accompanied by a certified statement of Petitioner's institutional account for the 6 months prior to this date. It is noted that a petition for mandamus is an original action and a separate motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis must be filed, regardless of Petitioner's fee status in other proceedings. If the filing fee is not paid or the motion is not filed, the petition may be dismissed without further notice. See 3d Cir. L.A.R. Misc. 107.1. The petition will not be submitted to the Court until the filing fee or motion to proceed in forma pauperis is received. See Fed. R. App. P. 21(a)(3).--[Edited 04/18/2022 by TMM] (TMM) [Entered: 04/18/2022 11:10 AM]
|
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DOCKETED. Notice filed by Petitioner Ernest Woodall. (TMM) [Entered: 04/18/2022 10:59 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
