Calvin Hill-Gamble v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
| CALVIN HILL-GAMBLE |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI |
| 22-2201 |
| June 29, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER (Clerk) granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Calvin Hill-Gamble. (CJG) [Entered: 07/28/2022 08:47 AM]
|
| Filing 7 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Ryan H. Lysaght on behalf of Appellee(s) Pennsylvania Attorney General, et alia. [22-2201] (RHL) [Entered: 07/19/2022 08:16 AM] |
| Filing 6 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Ronald Eisenberg, Esq. and Ryan H. Lysaght, Esq. for Superintendent Rockview SCI and Attorney General Pennsylvania requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 08/01/2022. (CJG) [Entered: 07/18/2022 02:20 PM] |
| Filing 5 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Calvin Hill-Gamble. (CJG) [Entered: 07/18/2022 10:29 AM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION filed by Appellant Calvin Hill-Gamble to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (CJG) [Entered: 07/18/2022 10:29 AM] |
| Filing 3 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case will be submitted to a panel of this Court for a decision on the issuance of certificate of appealability. (MW) [Entered: 07/01/2022 11:52 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (CJG) [Entered: 06/29/2022 11:54 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Calvin Hill-Gamble in District Court No. 1-20-cv-01592. (CJG) [Entered: 06/29/2022 11:50 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
