Ashu Shukla v. University of Pennsylvania Health Systems, et al
Defendant: WEST WINDSOR POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff / Appellant: ASHU SHUKLA
Defendant / Appellee: UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEMS, PENN MEDICINE UNIVERSITY CITY, CAPITAL HEALTH REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, JOANNA ROHDE, ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case Number: 22-2257
Filed: July 11, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Medical Malpractice
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 5, 2022 Filing 31 ECF FILER: LETTER from Party Ashu Shukla in 22-2029, 22-2257 Defense against multiple cases denied by Judge FUrman at the SDNY for failure to file a claim within relevant timelines. This information ensures that the plaintiff and other case witnesses easily are able to file claims against Deloitte/Joanna in future. Certificate of Service dated 09/04/2022. Service made by ECF. [22-2029, 22-2257] (AS) [Entered: 09/05/2022 12:26 AM]
August 24, 2022 Filing 30 ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellee Joanna Rohde in 22-2029, 22-2257 to advising of possible summary action, for summary action. Certificate of Service dated 08/24/2022. [22-2029, 22-2257] (HWB) [Entered: 08/24/2022 09:38 PM]
August 24, 2022 Filing 29 ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellees Penn Medicine University City and University of Pennsylvania Health Systems in 22-2029, 22-2257 to Motion for Summary Action. Certificate of Service dated 08/24/2022. [22-2029, 22-2257]--[Edited 08/25/2022 by CJG] (PEP) [Entered: 08/24/2022 05:09 PM]
August 24, 2022 Filing 28 ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellee Capital Health Regional Medical Center in 22-2029, 22-2257 to Motion for Summary Action. Certificate of Service dated 08/24/2022. [22-2029, 22-2257]--[Edited 08/25/2022 by CJG] (MBP) [Entered: 08/24/2022 12:52 PM]
August 23, 2022 Filing 27 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellant Ashu Shukla in 22-2029, 22-2257 to Reconsider Some Aspects of the Court Order dated 08/30/22 on Summary Enforcement. Certificate of Service dated 08/23/2022. Service made by ECF. [22-2029, 22-2257]--[Edited 08/25/2022 by CJG] (AS) [Entered: 08/23/2022 11:56 PM]
August 21, 2022 Filing 26 ECF FILER: SUPPLEMENTAL ELECTRONIC ADDENDUM to MOTION on behalf of Appellant Ashu Shukla in 22-2029, 22-2257 containing Supplemental documents in support of plaintiff's Motion for Summary Action. These documents which include a Motion request for an extension of statute of limitations (Appeal# 21-2114, 22-0591 2nd Circuit) provide reasonable support to plaintiff's Motion. Certificate of Service dated 08/20/2022 by ECF. [22-2029, 22-2257] (AS) [Entered: 08/21/2022 07:13 AM]
August 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER (Clerk) The foregoing motion is considered. Although the briefing schedule has issued regarding these consolidated appeals, it appears that it may be appropriate to submit the appellants motion for summary action to the next available motions panel of this Court for a determination prior to briefing. The Court also will consider possible summary action pursuant to Chapter 10.6 of the Internal Operation Procedures of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. See also Third Circuit Local Appellate Rule 27.4. Chapter 10.6 provides that the Court sua sponte (by its own action) may take summary action on an appeal if it appears that no substantial question is presented or that subsequent precedent or a change in circumstances warrants such action. Specifically, the Court may affirm, reverse, vacate, modify, or remand the judgment or order appealed. Accordingly, the briefing schedule is stayed at this time and the parties may file written responses within 7 days from the date of this Order addressing possible summary action. Upon receipt of these responses, the cases will be submitted for a determination whether summary action is appropriate and for consideration of all the motions and responses filed by the parties in these consolidated cases. The parties will be sent a copy of any Order(s) that is issued in this matter. [22-2029, 22-2257] (NF) [Entered: 08/17/2022 04:00 PM]
August 16, 2022 Filing 24 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellees University of Pennsylvania Health Systems and Penn Medicine University City in 22-2257. [22-2029, 22-2257] (PEP) [Entered: 08/16/2022 02:34 PM]
August 16, 2022 Filing 23 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Paul E. Peel, Esquire on behalf of Appellee(s) University of Pennsylvania Health Systems and Penn Medicine University City. [22-2029, 22-2257] (PEP) [Entered: 08/16/2022 02:29 PM]
August 4, 2022 Filing 22 ECF FILER: Plaintiff's Certificate of Uncontested Motions Pursuant to Local Rules 27.3 filed by Appellant Ashu Shukla in 22-2029, 22-2257. Certificate of Service dated 08/04/2022. Service made by ECF. [22-2029, 22-2257] (AS) [Entered: 08/04/2022 03:37 PM]
August 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER (PHIPPS, Circuit Judges) The foregoing Motion by Appellant to unconsolidate the appeals construed as a motion to review the Clerks July 20, 2022, order is DENIED. Panel No.: CCO-095. Phipps, Authoring Judge. [22-2029, 22-2257] (AMR) [Entered: 08/02/2022 03:53 PM]
August 2, 2022 Filing 20 ECF FILER: LETTER from Attorney Heather W. Brochin, Esq. for Appellee Joanna Rohde in 22-2029, 22-2257 Letter addressing Ashu Shukla's recent filings.. Certificate of Service dated 08/02/2022. Service made by ECF. [22-2029, 22-2257] (HWB) [Entered: 08/02/2022 02:20 PM]
August 2, 2022 Filing 19 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Paul E. Peel, Esq. for University of Pennsylvania Health Systems and Penn Medicine University City, David A. Schwartz, Esq. for West Windsor Police Department and Marshall L. Schwartz, Esq. for University of Pennsylvania Health Systems and Penn Medicine University City requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form within 14 days. Disclosure Statement on or before 08/16/2022. (AMR) [Entered: 08/02/2022 09:08 AM]
August 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER (Clerk) Motion by Appellant to Unconsolidate Appeals. The foregoing motion to unconsolidate the appeals is construed as a motion to review the Clerks July 20, 2022 order. So construed, the motion is referred to a motions panel. [22-2029, 22-2257] (AMR) [Entered: 08/01/2022 03:47 PM]
August 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER (Clerk) Motion by Appellant for Protective Order. The foregoing motion is referred to the merits panel. [22-2029, 22-2257] (AMR) [Entered: 08/01/2022 09:49 AM]
July 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER (Clerk) The foregoing letter motion to take judicial notice is referred to the merits panel. No action will be taken on the remaining letters at ECF Nos. 23, 26, and 27, as they do not request any specific relief. If the letters are intended to provide argument in support of the appeal, Appellant must include such arguments in his or her brief due on or before August 29, 2022. To the extent Appellant states that he or she intends to file a motion to stay and does not intend to file the brief, no action can be taken as this is not considered a formal request pursuant to Rule 27 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Appellant is cautioned that failure to file the brief and appendix on or before August 29, 2022, will result in the dismissal of the appeal without further notice. See Fed. R. App. P. 3(a) and 3rd Cir. Misc. 107.2(b). [22-2029, 22-2257] (AMR) [Entered: 07/27/2022 12:57 PM]
July 25, 2022 Filing 15 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellant Ashu Shukla to Unconsolidate the Appeals at Nos. 22-2029 & 22-2257. Certificate of Service dated 07/25/2022. Service made by ECF. [22-2029& 22-2257]--[Edited 07/26/2022 by CJG] (AS) [Entered: 07/25/2022 11:59 PM]
July 20, 2022 Filing 14 ECF FILER: LETTER from Party Ashu Shukla in 22-2029, 22-2257 Letter Introducing the case Part II - Plaintiff's Five (5) Whistle Blower Allegations against Deloitte explained in simple terms. Certificate of Service dated 07/20/2022. Service made by ECF. [22-2029, 22-2257] (AS) [Entered: 07/20/2022 04:33 PM]
July 20, 2022 Filing 13 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Appellant Ashu Shukla due on or before 08/29/2022. Appendix due on or before 08/29/2022. [22-2029, 22-2257] (AMR) [Entered: 07/20/2022 12:06 PM]
July 20, 2022 Filing 12 CLERK ORDER consolidating the Appeals at Nos. 22-2029, 22-2257 for All Purposes. [22-2029, 22-2257] [Please open the attachment for the full text of the Order] (AMR) [Entered: 07/20/2022 12:03 PM]
July 19, 2022 Filing 11 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Alyssa R. Musmanno on behalf of Appellee(s) Joanna Rohde. [22-2257] (AM) [Entered: 07/19/2022 03:14 PM]
July 19, 2022 Filing 10 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Heather Weine Brochin on behalf of Appellee(s) Joanna Rohde. [22-2257] (HWB) [Entered: 07/19/2022 03:12 PM]
July 17, 2022 Filing 9 ECF FILER: LETTER from Party Ashu Shukla Case introduction about the malicious interests of Deloitte HR Professionals - their intent to survive - their motivation to thrive - Power and Politics always above human ingenuity, ethics and integrity. Certificate of Service dated 07/17/2022. Service made by ECF. [22-2257] (AS) [Entered: 07/17/2022 12:08 PM]
July 15, 2022 Filing 8 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Andrew F. Albero on behalf of Appellee(s) Capital Health System, Inc.. [22-2257] (AA) [Entered: 07/15/2022 12:49 PM]
July 15, 2022 Filing 7 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee Capital Health Regional Medical Center. [22-2257] (MBP) [Entered: 07/15/2022 12:45 PM]
July 15, 2022 Filing 6 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Michael B. Pullano on behalf of Appellee(s) Capital Health System, Inc.. [22-2257] (MBP) [Entered: 07/15/2022 12:44 PM]
July 12, 2022 Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Rebecca S. Melley on behalf of Appellee(s) Attorney General of the United States and US Attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. [22-2257] (RSM) [Entered: 07/12/2022 12:06 PM]
July 12, 2022 Filing 4 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellant Ashu Shukla for Protective Order. Certificate of Service dated 07/11/2022. Service made by ECF. [22-2257] [SEND TO MERITS PANEL] (AS) [Entered: 07/12/2022 12:30 AM]
July 12, 2022 Filing 3 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Self Represented on behalf of Appellant(s) Ashu Shukla. [22-2257] (AS) [Entered: 07/12/2022 12:08 AM]
July 11, 2022 Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (AMR) [Entered: 07/11/2022 01:12 PM]
July 11, 2022 Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Ashu Shukla in District Court No. 2-20-cv-05634. (AMR) [Entered: 07/11/2022 01:09 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ashu Shukla v. University of Pennsylvania Health Systems, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: ASHU SHUKLA
Represented By: Ashu Shukla
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEMS
Represented By: Paul E. Peel Esq.
Represented By: Marshall L. Schwartz Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PENN MEDICINE UNIVERSITY CITY
Represented By: Paul E. Peel Esq.
Represented By: Marshall L. Schwartz Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CAPITAL HEALTH REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
Represented By: Michael B. Pullano Esq.
Represented By: Andrew Albero Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JOANNA ROHDE
Represented By: Heather W. Brochin Esq.
Represented By: Gregory S. Tabakman Esq.
Represented By: Alyssa Musmanno Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Rebecca S. Melley Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: UNITED STATES ATTORNEY EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Represented By: Rebecca S. Melley Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WEST WINDSOR POLICE DEPARTMENT
Represented By: David A. Schwartz Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?