Xing Zheng v. Attorney General United States of America
| XING YING ZHENG |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 23-1035 |
| January 5, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Xing Zheng v. Attorney General United States of America |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ECF FILER: AGENCY INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Petitioner Xing Ying Zheng. [23-1035] (FC) [Entered: 01/12/2023 06:24 PM] |
| Filing 6 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Petitioner Xing Ying Zheng. [23-1035] (FC) [Entered: 01/12/2023 06:14 PM] |
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Fabiola Cini on behalf of Petitioner(s) Xing Ying ZHENG. [23-1035] (FC) [Entered: 01/12/2023 05:59 PM] |
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Anthony C. Payne on behalf of Respondent(s) Merrick B. Garland, United States Attorney General. [23-1035] (ACP) [Entered: 01/11/2023 02:29 PM] |
| Filing 3 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Jeffery R. Leist on behalf of Respondent(s) Merrick B. Garland, U.S. Attorney General. [23-1035] (JRL) [Entered: 01/06/2023 09:29 AM] |
Filing 2
ORDER (Clerk) directing the Executive Office of Immigration Review to file the administrative record. (SB) [Entered: 01/06/2023 09:25 AM]
|
| Filing 1 AGENCY CASE DOCKETED. Petition filed by Xing Ying Zheng. Certificate of Service dated 01/05/2023. Service made by ECF. Payment made through pay.gov.. Receipt No. A03-63553-721. (SB) [Entered: 01/06/2023 09:21 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
