Jose Galarza-Alvarado v. Attorney General United States of America
| JOSE CRUZ GALARZA-ALVARADO |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 23-2595 |
| August 31, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Richard Zanfardino on behalf of Respondent(s) Merrick B. Garland, U.S. Attorney General. [23-2595] (RZ) [Entered: 09/01/2023 02:57 PM] |
Filing 6
ORDER (Clerk) temporarily granting motion for stay of removal in accordance with the Standing Order of the Court dated August 5, 2015. Removal is stayed until such time as the Court can consider the motion for stay of removal. (PDB) [Entered: 08/31/2023 04:45 PM]
|
| Filing 5 MOTION filed by Petitioner Jose Cruz Galarza-Alvarado to Stay Removal. Response due on 09/11/2023. Certificate of Service dated 08/31/2023. Service made by ECF. (PDB) [Entered: 08/31/2023 04:43 PM] |
| Filing 4 AGENCY DOCKETING STATEMENT on behalf of Petitioner Jose Cruz Galarza-Alvarado, received. (PDB) [Entered: 08/31/2023 04:42 PM] |
| Filing 3 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE filed by Attorney Alexandra Miron, Esq. for Petitioner Jose Cruz Galarza-Alvarado.. (PDB) [Entered: 08/31/2023 04:41 PM] |
|
Filing 2
ORDER (Clerk) directing the Executive Office of Immigration Review to file the administrative record. (PDB) [Entered: 08/31/2023 04:38 PM]
|
| Filing 1 AGENCY CASE DOCKETED. Petition filed by Jose Cruz Galarza-Alvarado. Certificate of Service dated 08/31/2023. Service made by ECF. Payment made through pay.gov.. Receipt No. A03-64519-753. (PDB) [Entered: 08/31/2023 04:34 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
