In re: John Castro
| In re: JOHN ANTHONY CASTRO |
| GLENN G. REIS and LAFARO & REISER LLP |
| ROBERT KIRSCH |
| 23-2798 |
| October 6, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE for noncompliance order. Service made on 10/09/2023 by ECF. [23-2798] (JAC) [Entered: 10/09/2023 12:13 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (TMM) [Entered: 10/06/2023 10:19 AM] |
| Filing 2 NONCOMPLIANCE Order Action on the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby deferred. Petitioner John Anthony Castro did not provide a copy of the petition for writ of mandamus to the District Court Judge. See Fed. R. App. P. 21(a)(1). A certificate of service reflecting that the petition has been served must be submitted to the Court of Appeals within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order. See Rules 21 and 25, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. If proof of service is not filed with the Court, the petition may be dismissed without further notice. In addition, the petition will not be submitted to the Court until proof of service is received. (TMM) [Entered: 10/06/2023 10:14 AM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DOCKETED. Notice filed by Petitioner John Anthony Castro . Received on 9/29/2023. Payment made through pay.gov.. Receipt No. A03-64633-923. (TMM) [Entered: 10/06/2023 09:51 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
