Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Erik VanderbeckIn re: Erik Vanderbeck
as 24-1318
Petitioner: In re: ERIK VANDERBECK
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ROBERT KIRSCH
Kevin Dodson v. United States District Court for the District of N, et al
as 23-3172
Plaintiff / Appellant: KEVIN DODSON
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY, Clarkson S. Fisher Building & U.S. Courthouse, HON. ROBERT KIRSCH, JONATHAN M. CARRILLO and others
John Lee Gore v. , et alIn re: John Lee Gore v. , et al
as 23-3138
Petitioner: In re: JOHN LEE GORE
Respondent: HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS, ERIC SMIDT, Chairman and CEO and ROBERT KIRSCH
DODSON v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv22433
Plaintiff: KEVIN DODSON
Defendant: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY, HON. ROBERT KIRSCH, CARRILLO JONATHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
In re: John Castro
as 23-2798
Petitioner: In re: JOHN ANTHONY CASTRO
Respondent: GLENN G. REIS and LAFARO & REISER LLP
Not Classified By Court: ROBERT KIRSCH
Kirsch v. Tenneco Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00399
Plaintiff: Robert Kirsch
Defendant: Tenneco Inc., Roy V Arnes, Thomas C. Freyman and others
WEMUSA v. KIRSCH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv20746
Defendant: HON. ROBERT KIRSCH and JACK M. SABATINO
Plaintiff: JAMUGA M. WEMUSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1285
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1284
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1037
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?