Carlos Vieyra v. Attorney General United States of America
Petitioner: CARLOS ALEJANDRO VIEYRA
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 24-1127
Filed: January 19, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 19, 2024 Filing 6 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Remi da Rocha-Afodu on behalf of Respondent(s) ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. [24-1127] (Rd) [Entered: 01/19/2024 03:53 PM]
January 19, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER (Clerk) Based on the circumstances presented in the above-captioned petition for review and the petitioner's stay motion, venue is presumed to be proper in the Third Circuit. As such, the petitioner is entitled to a temporary administrative stay of removal in accordance with the Standing Order of the Court dated August 5, 2015. Accordingly, the foregoing motion for a stay of removal is temporarily granted; removal is stayed until such time as the Court can consider the motion for stay of removal. The parties must still respond to the order to show cause issued earlier today, and venue will be reevaluated after those responses. (CJG) [Entered: 01/19/2024 03:44 PM]
January 19, 2024 Filing 4 MOTION filed by Petitioner Carlos Alejandro Vieyra to Stay Removal. Response due on 01/29/2024. Certificate of Service dated 01/19/2024. Service made by ECF. (CJG) [Entered: 01/19/2024 03:06 PM]
January 19, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER (Clerk) The petition for review from the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals, issued on January 10, 2024, was filed in this Court. Pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Section: 1252(b)(2), a petition for review shall be filed with the court of appeals for the judicial circuit in which the immigration judge completed the proceedings. An order finding Petitioner removable was issued by an immigration judge for the Cleveland, Ohio, immigration court. Accordingly, the parties are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE within 14 days why the above-captioned petition for review should not be transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. (CJG) [Entered: 01/19/2024 01:59 PM]
January 19, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER (Clerk) directing the Executive Office of Immigration Review to file the administrative record. (CJG) [Entered: 01/19/2024 01:56 PM]
January 19, 2024 Filing 1 AGENCY CASE DOCKETED. Petition filed by Carlos Alejandro Vieyra. Certificate of Service dated 01/19/2024. Service made by US mail. Payment made through pay.gov. Receipt No. A03-65137-776. (CJG) [Entered: 01/19/2024 01:52 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Carlos Vieyra v. Attorney General United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: CARLOS ALEJANDRO VIEYRA
Represented By: Brennan J. Gian-Grasso Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Merrick B. Garland Esq.
Represented By: OIL
Represented By: Remi da Rocha-Afodu Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?