Kevino GrahamIn re: Kevino Graham
| In re: KEVINO GRAHAM |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and CYNTHIA M. RUFE |
| 24-1177 |
| January 30, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NONCOMPLIANCE Order sent to Petitioner Kevino Graham. Action on the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby deferred. Petitioner did not provide a copy of the petition for writ of mandamus to the District Court judge. See Fed. R. App. P. 21(a)(1). In addition, a copy of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis must be served on each party to the proceeding, to include the District Court judge. A certificate of service reflecting that the petition has been provided to the District Court judge must be submitted to the Court of Appeals within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. See Rules 21 and 25, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. If proof of service is not filed with the Court, the petition may be dismissed without further notice. In addition, the petition will not be submitted to the Court until proof of service is received. Any ruling on Petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis will be deferred until after Petitioner submits a certificate of service. (JK) [Entered: 01/30/2024 02:57 PM] |
| Filing 3 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT on behalf of Petitioner Kevino Graham. (JK) [Entered: 01/30/2024 02:16 PM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION filed by Petitioner Kevino Graham to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (JK) [Entered: 01/30/2024 02:16 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DOCKETED. Notice filed by Petitioner Kevino Graham. (JK) [Entered: 01/30/2024 02:13 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
