Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Kevino GrahamIn re: Kevino Graham
as 24-1177
Petitioner:
In re: KEVINO GRAHAM
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and CYNTHIA M. RUFE
Shaquan BrownIn re: Shaquan Brown
as 22-1460
Petitioner:
In re: SHAQUAN BROWN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and CYNTHIA M. RUFE
Clervrain v. Chambers et al
as 4:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Brad Chambers, General Clif Todey, Joel Gorelick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kareem MillhouseIn re: Kareem Millhouse
as 22-1031
Petitioner:
In re: KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, B. MOTTERN, Senior Officer, BOUSSAUG, Senior Officer and others
Amin Rashid
as 21-2900
Petitioner:
In re: AMIN A. RASHID
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and CYNTHIA M. RUFE
In re: Nicholas Dupree, et al
as 21-2561
Petitioner:
In re: NICHOLAS DUPREE
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, SECETARY OF CORRECTIONS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and others
Actavis Holdco US, et alIn re: Actavis Holdco US, et al
as 19-3549
Respondent:
NON-PETITIONER DEFENDANTS MDL 2724, INDIRECT RESELLER PLAINTIFFS MDL 2724, STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL PLAINTIFFS MDL 2724 and others
Petitioner:
AKORN SALES INC, MAYNE PHARMA INC, SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES INC and others
Not Yet Classified:
CYNTHIA M. RUFE
Jose TorresIn re: Jose Torres
as 19-3053
Petitioner:
In re: JOSE LUIS TORRES
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEHIGH COUNTY and KEVIN KAUFFMAN
Not Yet Classified:
CYNTHIA M. RUFE
In re: Dwayne Parker
as 19-1042
Undetermined:
CYNTHIA M. RUFE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and In re: DWAYNE PARKER
In re: Bob Krist
as 17-3444
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: BOB KRIST
Defendant - Respondent:
MCGRAW-HILL SCHOOL EDUCATION HOLDINGS LLC and MCGRAW-HILL GLOBAL EDUCATION HOLDINGS LLC
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
CYNTHIA M. RUFE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
