Genivaldo Pimenta, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
GENIVALDO PEREIRA PIMENTA, QUEITANI DE SOUZA ALVES and CARLOS EDUARDO SOUZA PEREIRA ALVES |
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
24-1354 |
February 26, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Petitioners Genivaldo Pereira Pimenta, Carlos Eduardo Souza Pereira Alves and Queitani De Souza Alves. [24-1354] (SMA) [Entered: 02/27/2024 04:14 PM] |
Filing 5 ECF FILER: AGENCY INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Petitioners Genivaldo Pereira Pimenta, Carlos Eduardo Souza Pereira Alves and Queitani De Souza Alves. [24-1354] (SMA) [Entered: 02/27/2024 04:12 PM] |
Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Stuart Altman on behalf of Petitioner(s) Genvaldo Pereira Pimenta, Quetani De Souza Alves, Carlos Eduardo Souza Pereira Alves. [24-1354] (SMA) [Entered: 02/27/2024 04:09 PM] |
Filing 3 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Stephen P. Finn on behalf of Respondent(s) Merrick B. Garland, U.S. Attorney General. [24-1354] (SF) [Entered: 02/27/2024 09:49 AM] |
Filing 2 ORDER (Clerk) directing the Executive Office of Immigration Review to file the administrative record. (PDB) [Entered: 02/26/2024 05:49 PM] |
Filing 1 AGENCY CASE DOCKETED. Petition filed by Queitani De Souza Alves, Carlos Eduardo Souza Pereira Alves and Genivaldo Pereira Pimenta. Certificate of Service dated 02/06/2024. Service made by ECF. Receipt attached.. Receipt No. A03-65166-975.. (PDB) [Entered: 02/26/2024 05:44 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.