Nahid Reza, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
Petitioner: NAHID REZA, SHIMIN SHABNAM and N. N. N.
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 24-1504
Filed: March 18, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 19, 2024 Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Giovanni B. Di Maggio on behalf of Respondent(s) US Attorney General. [24-1504] (GD) [Entered: 03/19/2024 11:52 AM]
March 19, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER (Clerk) directing the Executive Office of Immigration Review to file the administrative record. (CJG) [Entered: 03/19/2024 10:33 AM]
March 19, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER (Clerk) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2 (made applicable by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 25(a)(5)) and Third Circuit Local Appellate Rule 113.12, personal identifier information must be redacted from most filings. These identifiers include Social Security numbers, names of minor children, financial account numbers, dates of birth, and home addresses in criminal cases. Litigants are responsible for redacting documents. Accordingly, the docket will be altered to use the initials of the minor child Petitioner, rather than Petitioner's full name. It is noted that the parents of the minor child are identified in the case and caption by their full names. If the parents wish to be identified by their initials as the minor child is or to proceed under a pseudonym, a motion requesting such relief must be filed with the Court within 7 days of the date of this Order. Otherwise, the case will continue under the full names of the parents. [-See Order for Full Text.] (CJG) [Entered: 03/19/2024 10:32 AM]
March 18, 2024 Filing 1 AGENCY CASE DOCKETED. Petition filed by N. N. N., Nahid Reza and Shimin Shabnam. Certificate of Service dated 03/19/2024. Service made by US mail. Payment made through pay.gov. Receipt No. A03-65252-150. (CJG) [Entered: 03/19/2024 10:27 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Nahid Reza, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: NAHID REZA
Represented By: Alex G. Isbell Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: SHIMIN SHABNAM
Represented By: Alex G. Isbell Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: N. N. N.
Represented By: Alex G. Isbell Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Giovanni Di Maggio Esq.
Represented By: Merrick B. Garland Esq.
Represented By: OIL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?