Raheem Brennerman v. Warden Allenwood FCI Low
| RAHEEM J. BRENNERMAN |
| WARDEN ALLENWOOD FCI LOW |
| 25-1252 |
| February 12, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER (Clerk) The letter motion is granted and the appeal is stayed pending the filing and disposition of the supplemental traverse in the District Court. The parties are directed to file written reports addressing the status of the pending proceedings on May 5, 2025 and every thirty (30) days thereafter. The parties must immediately advise the Clerk's Office in writing upon the disposition of the proceedings. It should be noted that any party who wishes to challenge the order disposing of the supplemental traverse must file a new notice of appeal. The notice of appeal must be filed within the time prescribed by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a). This stay does not apply to the obligation to pay filing and docketing fees for the appeal. Within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order, Appellant must either pay the $605 fee in the District Court or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in this Court. A form affidavit is enclosed for Appellant's convenience. Appellant must also file a certified copy of his prison account statement for the six-month period prior to the filing of the notice of appeal within the same fourteen-day period. Failure to pay the fee or file the motion and account statement may result in dismissal of this case without further notice. 3d Cir. L.A.R. Misc. 107. Answer due 04/21/2025. (AMR) [Entered: 04/07/2025 02:11 PM]
|
| Filing 5 Letter Motion filed by Appellant Raheem J. Brennerman to Hold Appeal in Abeyance pending adjudication of supplemental traverse in District Court. (LMR) [Entered: 03/06/2025 03:02 PM] |
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from AUSA Patrick J. Bannon on behalf of Appellee(s) Warden Allenwood FCI Loaw. [25-1252] (PJB) [Entered: 02/12/2025 03:06 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (AMR) [Entered: 02/12/2025 01:49 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (AMR) [Entered: 02/12/2025 01:49 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Raheem J. Brennerman in District Court No. 3:24-cv-02029. (AMR) [Entered: 02/12/2025 01:39 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Raheem Brennerman v. Warden Allenwood FCI Low | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: RAHEEM J. BRENNERMAN | |
| Represented By: | Raheem J. Brennerman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: WARDEN ALLENWOOD FCI LOW | |
| Represented By: | G. Michael Thiel Esq. |
| Represented By: | Richard Euliss Esq. |
| Represented By: | Patrick J. Bannon Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
