In re: Flora Hoi
| In re: FLORA HOI, on behalf of EVA USA |
| EVA AIRWAYS CORP BOARD OF DIRECTORS, CHANG KUO-HUA, KO LEE-CHING, TAI JIIN-CHYUAN, SUN CHIA-MING, LIAO CHI-WEI, CHIEN YOU-HSIN, WU CHUNG-PAO, EVA AIRWAYS CORP BOARD OFFICERS, HO CHING-SHENG, HSU HUI-SEN, CHEN YAO-MIN, HSIAO CHIN-LUNG, TSAI TA-WEI, EVA AIRWAYS CORP, GREGORY B. WILLIAMS, REED C. O'CONNOR and KAREN GREN SCHOLER |
| HSU SHUN-HSIUNG |
| 25-1479 |
| March 27, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER (SHWARTZ, MATEY and CHUNG, Circuit Judges) Petitioner's "Application for Leave to File Joint Notice Appeal Mandamus Sequor Writ of Error Coram Nobis Before the Court and Its JPML" (hereinafter "the Application"), which has been docketed as a petition for a writ of mandamus, is denied. Even under the most liberal construction of the Application, Petitioner has not demonstrated that she is entitled to a writ of mandamus. See Hollingsworth v. Perry, 558 U.S. 183, 190 (2010) (per curiam). Furthermore, Petitioner is not eligible for a writ of error coram nobis, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(e), and no other writ is warranted here. We see no reason to treat the Application as a notice of appeal from District Court orders entered over a year ago in Petitioner's cases (either for the purpose of transferring the appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit the Circuit covering the Northern District of Texas or adjudicating the appeal ourselves), for such an appeal would clearly be time-barred. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A); see also Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 209, 214 (2007). To the extent that the Application seeks any other relief from us, that relief is denied.. Panel No.: BLD-121. Matey , Authoring Judge. (PDB) [Entered: 05/01/2025 11:14 AM]
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (PDB) [Entered: 03/27/2025 03:38 PM] |
| Filing 4 Exhibits Submitted on CD with Mandamus Petition. Certificate of Service dated 03/27/2025. Service made by ECF. (PDB) [Entered: 03/27/2025 03:38 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER (Clerk) The foregoing motion is granted. The Court may reconsider in forma pauperis status or request additional information at any time during the course of these proceedings. (PDB) [Entered: 03/27/2025 03:33 PM]
|
| Filing 2 MOTION filed by Petitioner Flora Hoi to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (PDB) [Entered: 03/27/2025 03:30 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DOCKETED. Notice filed by Petitioner Flora Hoi. (PDB) [Entered: 03/27/2025 03:26 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
