Jesse Engram v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
Plaintiff: JESSE ENGRAM
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Case Number: 25-1627
Filed: April 7, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 13, 2025 Filing 10 RECORD received. Box. (SJB) [Entered: 06/13/2025 09:42 AM]
June 10, 2025 Filing 9 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellant Jesse Engram to expand certificate appealability. Certificate of Service dated 06/10/2025. Service made by ECF. [25-1627] (MW) [Entered: 06/10/2025 12:37 PM]
April 7, 2025 Filing 8 ECF FILER: Transcript Purchase Order Form (Part 1) filed by Appellant Jesse Engram advising this court that no transcripts are available. [25-1627] (MW) [Entered: 04/07/2025 04:52 PM]
April 7, 2025 Filing 7 ECF FILER: CIVIL INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Jesse Engram. [25-1627] (MW) [Entered: 04/07/2025 04:50 PM]
April 7, 2025 Filing 6 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Jesse Engram. [25-1627] (MW) [Entered: 04/07/2025 04:49 PM]
April 7, 2025 Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Michael Wiseman on behalf of Appellant(s) Jesse Engram. [25-1627] (MW) [Entered: 04/07/2025 04:48 PM]
April 7, 2025 Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Madeline W. Sheerer on behalf of Appellee(s) all appellees. [25-1627] (MWS) [Entered: 04/07/2025 02:53 PM]
April 7, 2025 Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (JK) [Entered: 04/07/2025 11:18 AM]
April 7, 2025 Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (JK) [Entered: 04/07/2025 11:17 AM]
April 7, 2025 Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Jesse Engram in District Court No. 2:21-cv-01834. (JK) [Entered: 04/07/2025 10:58 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Jesse Engram v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JESSE ENGRAM
Represented By: Michael Wiseman Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI
Represented By: Madeline W. Sheerer Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Represented By: Madeline W. Sheerer Esq.
Represented By: Ronald Eisenberg Esq.
Represented By: Susan E. Affronti Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Represented By: Madeline W. Sheerer Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?