Martin Jonassen, et al v. BOP, et al
| MARTIN JONASSEN and ELIZABETH MARY JONASSEN |
| BOP, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MR. PERKINS, C/O MR. WOODS, D.O. MICHAEL WALT, NURSE M.M. MORRISSEROE, HEALTH SERVICES SUPERVISOR C. WALTER, C.O. WESEMAN, DHO MR. ZEHER, C.O. MR. MEISNER, C.O. MR. REYNOLDS, C.O. MR. J. WALKER, C.O. MR. LEBLANC, L.T. MR. HILL, LT. MR. SOTO, B.O.P. DEPUTY DIRECTOR WILLIAM LATHROP and WARDEN M. WASHINGTON |
| 25-2086 |
| June 10, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER (SHWARTZ, FREEMAN and CHUNG, Circuit Judges) This appeal is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction. All of Appellant's pending motions including those requesting counsel, release, and injunctive relief are denied. In light of our disposition, we do not reach the question of whether to make a determination under 28 U.S.C. Section: 1915(e)(2), or take summary action under our local rules and procedures. Panel No.: ALD-026. Shwartz, Authoring Judge. (GCH) [Entered: 11/12/2025 11:51 AM]
|
| Filing 13 MOTION filed by Appellant Martin Jonassen to Stay Appeal. Service made by the Clerk's Office via CM.ECF on 10/3/2025. (PDB) [Entered: 10/03/2025 04:29 PM] |
|
Filing 12
ORDER (Clerk) granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Martin Jonassen. The appeal will be submitted to a panel for determination under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2) or for summary action under Third Circuit L.A.R. 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6. Appellant may submit argument, which should not exceed 5 pages, in support of the appeal. The document, with certificate of service, must be filed with the clerk within 21 days of the date of this order. (GCH) [Entered: 09/25/2025 09:46 AM]
|
| Filing 11 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Martin Jonassen. (PDB) [Entered: 09/22/2025 11:54 AM] |
| Filing 10 NONCOMPLIANCE Order sent to Appellant Martin Jonassen requesting Prison Account Statement. Compliance due 09/17/2025. (PDB) [Entered: 09/03/2025 02:25 PM] |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE on behalf of Appellant Martin Jonassen to Legal Division letter for possible dismissal. Service made by the Clerk's office via cm.ecf on 07/01/2025. (PDB) [Entered: 07/01/2025 04:21 PM] |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE on behalf of Appellant Martin Jonassen to Legal Division letter advising of possible dismissal [ # 4 ]. Certificate of Service dated 06/18/2025. Service made by US mail. (PDB) [Entered: 06/25/2025 04:44 PM] |
| Filing 7 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER ADDENDUM on behalf of Appellant Martin Jonassen. (PDB) [Entered: 06/24/2025 11:59 AM] |
| Filing 6 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER AUTHORIZATION on behalf of Appellant Martin Jonassen. (PDB) [Entered: 06/24/2025 11:58 AM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION filed by Appellant Martin Jonassen to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (PDB) [Entered: 06/24/2025 11:58 AM] |
| Filing 4 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (NF) [Entered: 06/12/2025 04:08 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (PDB) [Entered: 06/10/2025 04:47 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (PDB) [Entered: 06/10/2025 04:45 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Martin Jonassen in District Court No. 1:24-cv-00001. (PDB) [Entered: 06/10/2025 04:39 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
