In re: David Catanzaro
| In re: DAVID J. CATANZARO |
| LYKART TECHNOLOGIES LLC, GROWKART, GOOGLE LLC, YOUTUBE.COM, APPLE INC, MOZILLA CORP, ALIEXPRESS, USIMPRINTS, WHOLESALE IN MOTION GROUP INC, ANYPROMO INC, DHGATE, JOSEPH F. SAPORITO, JR., PHILLIP J. CARABALLO and PRICE U.S. WHOLESALE |
| 25-2512 |
| August 11, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| David Catanzaro v. |
| David Catanzaro v. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 21
NOT PRECEDENTIAL PER CURIAM OPINION AND ORDER transferring the petition for writ of mandamus to the Federal Circuit. Coram: RESTREPO, PORTER and MONTGOMERY-REEVES, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 2. DLD-003 (SB) [Entered: 10/17/2025 04:18 PM]
|
|
Filing 20
ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Respondent Mozilla Corp. [25-2512] (JCB) [Entered: 09/08/2025 01:26 PM]
|
|
Filing 19
ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Respondents Google LLC and YouTube.com. [25-2512] (JVG) [Entered: 09/05/2025 12:29 PM]
|
|
Filing 18
ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Respondent AliExpress. [25-2512] (ZP) [Entered: 09/03/2025 11:07 AM]
|
|
Filing 17
ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Mozilla Corp. on behalf of Respondent(s) Rachael L. Lamkin. [25-2512] (RDL) [Entered: 09/02/2025 04:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 16
ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Jennifer C. Berger on behalf of Respondent(s) Mozilla Corp.. [25-2512] (JCB) [Entered: 09/02/2025 03:57 PM]
|
|
Filing 15
ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Respondent Apple Inc. [25-2512] (SHB) [Entered: 09/02/2025 03:55 PM]
|
|
Filing 14
ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Stephen H. Barrett on behalf of Respondent(s) Apple Inc.. [25-2512] (SHB) [Entered: 09/02/2025 03:52 PM]
|
|
Filing 13
Notice to the Court Regarding Appearance by Defauted Party.. Certificate of Service dated 09/02/2025. Service made by Email. (SB) [Entered: 09/02/2025 03:39 PM]
|
|
Filing 12
ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Zhen Pan on behalf of Respondent(s) ALIEXPRESS. [25-2512] (ZP) [Entered: 08/29/2025 03:09 PM]
|
|
Filing 11
ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Madeline A. Woodall on behalf of Respondent(s) Google LLC and YouTube, LLC. [25-2512] (MAW) [Entered: 08/27/2025 07:31 PM]
|
|
Filing 10
ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Erika H. Warren on behalf of Respondent(s) Google LLC and YouTube, LLC. [25-2512] (EW) [Entered: 08/27/2025 07:29 PM]
|
|
Filing 8
FOLLOW UP LETTER to Attorney Jennifer C. Berger, Esq. for Respondent Mozilla Corp requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 09/09/2025. Disclosure Statement on or before 09/09/2025. (SB) [Entered: 08/26/2025 09:44 AM]
|
|
Filing 7
FOLLOW UP LETTER to Attorney Caitlin P. Strauss, Esq. for Respondent AliExpress requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 09/09/2025. Disclosure Statement on or before 09/09/2025. (SB) [Entered: 08/26/2025 09:41 AM]
|
|
Filing 6
FOLLOW UP LETTER to Attorney Stephen H. Barrett, Esq. for Respondent Apple Inc requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 09/09/2025. Disclosure Statement on or before 09/09/2025. (SB) [Entered: 08/26/2025 09:39 AM]
|
|
Filing 5
FOLLOW UP LETTER to Attorney John V. Gorman, Esq. for Respondents Google LLC and YouTube.com requesting the following document(s): Disclosure Statement on or before 09/09/2025. (SB) [Entered: 08/26/2025 09:35 AM]
|
|
Filing 9
RESPONSE on behalf of Petitioner David J. Catanzaro to clerk order advising of possible dismissal. Certificate of Service dated 08/22/2025. Service made by US mail. (JK) [Entered: 08/26/2025 05:07 PM]
|
|
Filing 4
ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from John V. Gorman on behalf of Respondent(s) (1) Google LLC (2) YouTube, LLC. [25-2512] (JVG) [Entered: 08/25/2025 04:33 PM]
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER (Clerk) This petition for a writ of mandamus relates to two patent-infringement actions. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit may have exclusive jurisdiction over such a petition. See In re Arunachalam, 812 F.3d 290, 29294 (3d Cir. 2016) ("[W]hen the Federal Circuit has exclusive appellate jurisdiction over a patent infringement action, it has exclusive jurisdiction over mandamus petitions arising from that action as well."). The petitioner must file a written response addressing whether the petition should be dismissed or transferred to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The petitioner's response must be filed within twenty-one days of this order. (GCH) [Entered: 08/11/2025 12:17 PM]
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (GCH) [Entered: 08/11/2025 12:12 PM]
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DOCKETED. Notice filed by Petitioner David J. Catanzaro. (GCH) [Entered: 08/11/2025 11:57 AM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
