Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Bryant v. YouTube.com
as 1:2026cv00533
Plaintiff:
Jonathan W. Bryant
Defendant:
YouTube.com
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Catanzaro
as 26-102
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID J. CATANZARO
Respondent:
GOOGLE LLC, YOUTUBE.COM, APPLE INC. and others
In re: David Catanzaro
as 25-2512
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID J. CATANZARO
Respondent:
LYKART TECHNOLOGIES LLC, GROWKART, GOOGLE LLC and others
Zone v. YouTube, LLC, et al.
as 24-6157
Defendant:
NEAL MOHAN, CEO of Youtube.com LLC, CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY - DELAWARE, Employees-of Youtube.com-DOES, CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY - CALIFORNIA, Employees-of Youtube.com-DOES and others
Plaintiff:
RADE Q. ZONE, Email: [email protected], Alt Phone: (702) 785-1618
Zone v. Youtube.com LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00283
Defendant:
Youtube.com LLC, Does unnamed and Neal Mohan
Plaintiff:
Rade Q Zone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Irvin v. Google.com et al
as 0:2024cv60145
Plaintiff:
Matthew Irvin
Defendant:
Google.com, YouTube.com, Alexis Bynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Irvin v. Google.com et al
as 4:2023cv06659
Plaintiff:
Matthew Irvin
Defendant:
Google.com, YouTube.com, Alexis Bynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mooney v. YouTube.com et al
as 1:2019cv00666
Defendant:
YouTube.com and Facebook.com
Plaintiff:
Edward Charles Mooney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thugtorious Gs Activechuckss v. Amazon.com et al
as 2:2019cv04429
Defendant:
Gyfcat, Amazon.com, Google Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Thrgtorious Gs Activechuckss and Thugtorious Gs Activechuckss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.