Martin Jonassen, et al v. BOP, et al
| MARTIN JONASSEN and ELIZABETH MARY JONASSEN |
| FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MR. PERKINS, WOODS, D.O. MICHAEL WALT, NURSE M.M. MORRISSEROE, C. WALTER, HEALTH SERVICES SUPERVISOR, C.O.B. WESEMAN, DHO MR. ZEHER, C.O. MR. MEISNER, C.O. MR. REYNOLDS, C.O. MR. J. WALKER, C.O. MR. LEBLANC, L.T. MR. HILL, LT MR. SOTO, WILLIAM LATHROP, B.O.P. DEPUTY DIRECTOR and WARDEN M. WASHINGTON, WARDEN |
| 26-1683 |
| March 26, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 LETTTER MOTION filed by Appellant Martin Jonassen to Extend Time to File a response to the Clerks letter advising of possible dismissal due to a jurisdictional defect and summary action in 26-1159 and to extend the time to file a response to the Clerks letter advising of possible dismissal due to a jurisdictional defect in 26-1683 until August 14, 2026. Certificate of Service dated 05/21/2026. Service made by ECF. [26-1159, 26-1683] (KR) [Entered: 05/21/2026 04:05 PM] |
Filing 7
ORDER (Clerk) The motion is granted to the extent Appellant requests an extension of time to file a response to the Clerks letter advising of possible dismissal due to a jurisdictional defect. Appellants response must be filed within sixty (60) days of the date of this Order. It is noted, however, that the appeal docketing and filing fee in the amount of $605.00 remains outstanding. Within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order, Appellant must either pay to the district court the entire docketing and filing fee of $605.00 or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, along with an addendum to the affidavit in support of the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis , a completed form authorizing assessments to be made from his prison account, and a certified prison account. Should Appellant fail to either pay the fees or file the motion within the time stated, the appeal will be dismissed pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 3.3 and Misc. 107.1 without further notice. No action will be taken on Appellant request for a limited remand to obtain documents from the district court at the governments expense. Any request for copies of documents filed in the district court must be directed to that court. (KR) [Entered: 05/05/2026 02:17 PM]
|
| Filing 6 Duplicate notice of appeal filed by Appellant Martin Jonassen. (JK) [Entered: 05/05/2026 02:14 PM] |
| Filing 5 Notice of Material Deficient Record and Limited Remand Motion, construed as a Motion for Extension of Time until/for 60 days to file response to Legal Division letter advising of possible dismissal and summary action. Certificate of Service dated 04/29/2026. Service made by ECF. [26-1159, 26-1683] (KR) [Entered: 04/29/2026 02:42 PM] |
| Filing 4 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (MW) [Entered: 03/27/2026 02:31 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (TMM) [Entered: 03/26/2026 09:20 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (TMM) [Entered: 03/26/2026 09:20 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Martin Jonassen in District Court No. 1:24-cv-00001. (TMM) [Entered: 03/26/2026 09:17 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
