Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Chen v. Zadno et al
as 5:2026cv10492
Plaintiff:
Stanford Chen
Defendant:
Reza Zadno, Larry L Wood, Kevin Waters and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
California South Co., et al. v. Wood
as 3:2026cv01316
Plaintiff:
California South Co. and Megan A. Epstein
Defendant:
Ginh Wood
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Computer Fraud
Barberi v. Market Wood LLC et al
as 1:2026cv26306
Plaintiff:
Renzo Barberi
Defendant:
Market Wood LLC and 2397 WEST 76TH STREET LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Twyman v. Woods et al
as 3:2026cv03124
Plaintiff:
Linda Twyman
Defendant:
Gerald Woods and Kim Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sack v. Summit County et al
as 1:2026cv04291
Plaintiff:
Guy R. Sack
Defendant:
Summit County, Colorado, Town of Frisco, Colorado, Summit Fire & EMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wood County Educational Service Center v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv10311
Plaintiff:
Wood County Educational Service Center
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Instagram, LLC, Facebook Payments, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KING-BOMANI KATAHALI v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS-SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON et al
as 2:2026cv11733
Plaintiff:
KING-BOMANI KATAHALI LEHANA-1ST
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS-SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON and ELEAZAR SPRATLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Kelleher et al
as 4:2026cv01447
Plaintiff:
Teresa M. Wood
Defendant:
Robert E. Kelleher and Hearn Trucking, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
