Antle v. Johanns
Plaintiff - Appellant: BHAGAVAN ANTLE, d/b/a The Institute for Greatly Endangered and Rare Species (T.I.G.E.R.S.)
Defendant - Appellee: MIKE JOHANNS, Secretary of Agriculture of the United States of America
Case Number: 07-1396
Filed: May 10, 2007
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Agricultural Acts

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 12, 2008 Antle v. Johanns

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 12, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 920080212 Opinion
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Antle v. Johanns
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: BHAGAVAN ANTLE, d/b/a The Institute for Greatly Endangered and Rare Species (T.I.G.E.R.S.)
Represented By: William Stuart Duncan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: MIKE JOHANNS, Secretary of Agriculture of the United States of America
Represented By: Jimmie Ewing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?