Chase v. Baskerville
Plaintiff - Appellee: WESLEY CHASE
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: ALTON BASKERVILLE, Warden of the Powhatan Correctional Center, he is sued in his personal and official capacities, PARKER, Ms., Principal of the Powhatan Correctional Center, she is sued in her personal and official capacities, P. M. HENICK, Regional Ombudman, Virginia Department of Corrections, he or she is sued within he or she personal and official capacities and S. TRIMMER, Ms., Special Education, director for the Virginia Department of Education, she is sued in her personal and official capacities
Case Number: 07-7258
Filed: August 30, 2007
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
December 31, 2008 Chase v. Baskerville

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 31, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 920081231 Opinion
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Chase v. Baskerville
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: WESLEY CHASE
Represented By: Wesley Chase
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Intervenor/plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Sarah Elaine Harrington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: ALTON BASKERVILLE, Warden of the Powhatan Correctional Center, he is sued in his personal and official capacities
Represented By: Mark R. Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: PARKER, Ms., Principal of the Powhatan Correctional Center, she is sued in her personal and official capacities
Represented By: Mark R. Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: P. M. HENICK, Regional Ombudman, Virginia Department of Corrections, he or she is sued within he or she personal and official capacities
Represented By: Mark R. Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: S. TRIMMER, Ms., Special Education, director for the Virginia Department of Education, she is sued in her personal and official capacities
Represented By: Mark R. Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?