Sandra Randolph v. New Hanover County Registrar
| SANDRA B. RANDOLPH |
| NEW HANOVER COUNTY REGISTRAR OF DEEDS REBECCA TUCKER SMITH, IN HER INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, AND IN HER CAPACITY AS NEW HANOVER COUNTY REGISTRAR OF DEEDS |
| 08-1676 |
| June 19, 2008 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Jobs |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Sandra Randolph v. New Hanover County Registrar |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
920090514
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Sandra Randolph v. New Hanover County Registrar | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: SANDRA B. RANDOLPH | |
| Represented By: | Angela Newell Gray |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: NEW HANOVER COUNTY REGISTRAR OF DEEDS REBECCA TUCKER SMITH, IN HER INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, AND IN HER CAPACITY AS NEW HANOVER COUNTY REGISTRAR OF DEEDS | |
| Represented By: | Mary Craven Adams |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
