Frederick Aikens v. William Ingram, Jr.

Frederick Aikens v. William Ingram, Jr.

Plaintiff - Appellant:	FREDERICK AIKENS
Defendant - Appellee:	WILLIAM E. INGRAM, JR., individually and in his capacity as Adjutant General of the North Carolina Army National Guard, PETER VONJESS, individually and in his capacity as Lieutenant Colonel of the North Carolina National Guard, BRIAN MCCARTHY, individually and in his capacity as a member of the North Carolina Army National Guard and PAUL JONES, individually and in his capacity as a member of the North Carolina Army National Guard
Case Number:	08-2278
Filed:	November 19, 2008
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed	Description
July 6, 2010	Frederick Aikens v. William Ingram, Jr.
July 13, 2011	Aikens v. Ingram, Jr. et al.

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 13, 2011	Filing 403427032 PUBLISHED AUTHORED OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:06-cv-00185-D Paper copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998630808]. [08-2278]
July 6, 2010	Filing 402876056 PUBLISHED AUTHORED OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:06-cv-00185-D Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998373881] [08-2278]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Frederick Aikens v. William Ingram, Jr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: FREDERICK AIKENS
Represented By:	William W. Webb
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: WILLIAM E. INGRAM, JR., individually and in his capacity as Adjutant General of the North Carolina Army National Guard
Represented By:	Roy Cooper
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: PETER VONJESS, individually and in his capacity as Lieutenant Colonel of the North Carolina National Guard
Represented By:	Roy Cooper
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: BRIAN MCCARTHY, individually and in his capacity as a member of the North Carolina Army National Guard
Represented By:	Roy Cooper
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: PAUL JONES, individually and in his capacity as a member of the North Carolina Army National Guard
Represented By:	Roy Cooper
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?