Gary Slezak v. Samuel Glover
Plaintiff - Appellant: GARY SLEZAK
Defendant - Appellee: SAMUEL B. GLOVER, Director of South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services in his individual and official capacity, SOUTH CAROLINA PROBATION, PARDON AND PAROLE BOARD, John and Jane Does in their official and individual capacities, JON OZMINT, Director of the South Carolina Department of Corrections in his individual and official capacity, STANLEY BURT, Warden of Lieber Correctional Institution in his individual and official capacity and RAMNARINE JAGLAL, Dentist, in his individual and official capacity
Case Number: 08-8167
Filed: October 21, 2008
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 3, 2009 Gary Slezak v. Samuel Glover

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 920090603
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Gary Slezak v. Samuel Glover
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: GARY SLEZAK
Represented By: Gary Slezak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: SAMUEL B. GLOVER, Director of South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services in his individual and official capacity
Represented By: Kenneth Paul Woodington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: SOUTH CAROLINA PROBATION, PARDON AND PAROLE BOARD, John and Jane Does in their official and individual capacities
Represented By: Kenneth Paul Woodington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: JON OZMINT, Director of the South Carolina Department of Corrections in his individual and official capacity
Represented By: Kenneth Paul Woodington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: STANLEY BURT, Warden of Lieber Correctional Institution in his individual and official capacity
Represented By: Kenneth Paul Woodington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: RAMNARINE JAGLAL, Dentist, in his individual and official capacity
Represented By: Kenneth Paul Woodington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?