Paul Braunstein v. Thomas Pickens, III
Plaintiff - Appellee: PAUL BRAUNSTEIN, KEVIN GASSER, JAMES IHA, D'ARCY BROWN, CRAIG KANARICK, KATIE FORD and ANDRE BALAZS
Defendant - Appellant: THOMAS B. PICKENS, III
Case Number: 09-2080
Filed: September 23, 2009
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instruments

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 4, 2011 Paul Braunstein v. Thomas Pickens, III

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 403137750 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:08-cv-00193-PMD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998495665] [09-2080]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Paul Braunstein v. Thomas Pickens, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: PAUL BRAUNSTEIN
Represented By: Andrew Kenneth Epting
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: KEVIN GASSER
Represented By: Andrew Kenneth Epting
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: JAMES IHA
Represented By: Andrew Kenneth Epting
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: D'ARCY BROWN
Represented By: Andrew Kenneth Epting
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: CRAIG KANARICK
Represented By: Andrew Kenneth Epting
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: KATIE FORD
Represented By: Andrew Kenneth Epting
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: ANDRE BALAZS
Represented By: Andrew Kenneth Epting
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: THOMAS B. PICKENS, III
Represented By: Tina Marie Cundari
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?