Thomas Ivey v. Jon Ozmint
Petitioner - Appellant: THOMAS TRESHAWN IVEY
Respondent - Appellee: JON OZMINT, individually and as Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections and HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER, individually and as Attorney General of South Carolina
Case Number: 09-3
Filed: April 29, 2009
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: Death Penalty
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Thomas Ivey v. Jon Ozmint
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: THOMAS TRESHAWN IVEY
Represented By: William Harry Ehlies
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: JON OZMINT, individually and as Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections
Represented By: Donald John Zelenka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER, individually and as Attorney General of South Carolina
Represented By: Donald John Zelenka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?