Debra Gause v. Warden of Camille Griffin Grah
Petitioner - Appellant: DEBRA C. GAUSE
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN OF CAMILLE GRIFFIN GRAHAM CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Case Number: 09-6493
Filed: March 18, 2009
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 1, 2009 Debra Gause v. Warden of Camille Griffin Grah

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 920090601
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Debra Gause v. Warden of Camille Griffin Grah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: DEBRA C. GAUSE
Represented By: Debra C. Gause
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: WARDEN OF CAMILLE GRIFFIN GRAHAM CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Represented By: Samuel Creighton Waters
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?