Philip Benham v. City of Charlotte, NC
| PHILIP BENHAM, as an individual and as a representative of Operation Save America, Inc., SHERYL CHANDLER, as an individual and as a representative of Operation Save America, Inc. and OPERATION SAVE AMERICA, INCORPORATED, a non-profit corporation |
| CITY OF CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA, a political subdivision of the State of North Carolina, EMILY WESTBROOK, in her individual capacity and KEITH PARKER, in his individual capacity |
| 10-1132 |
| February 3, 2010 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Philip Benham v. City of Charlotte, NC |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
403201726
PUBLISHED AUTHORED OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:07-cv-00395-RJC-DCK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998525428] [10-1132]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Philip Benham v. City of Charlotte, NC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: PHILIP BENHAM, as an individual and as a representative of Operation Save America, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Frederick Herbert Nelson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: SHERYL CHANDLER, as an individual and as a representative of Operation Save America, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Frederick Herbert Nelson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: OPERATION SAVE AMERICA, INCORPORATED, a non-profit corporation | |
| Represented By: | Frederick Herbert Nelson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: CITY OF CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA, a political subdivision of the State of North Carolina | |
| Represented By: | Robert Erwin Hagemann |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: EMILY WESTBROOK, in her individual capacity | |
| Represented By: | Robert Erwin Hagemann |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: KEITH PARKER, in his individual capacity | |
| Represented By: | Robert Erwin Hagemann |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
