New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. The Fairfax County Board
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC, d/b/a AT&T Mobility |
THE FAIRFAX COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS |
10-2381 |
December 13, 2010 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other Statutory Actions |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. The Fairfax Cty. Bd. of Supervisors |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 403812780 PUBLISHED AUTHORED OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:10-cv-00283-LMB-TRJ Paper copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998812806]. [10-2381] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. The Fairfax County Board | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant: NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC, d/b/a AT&T Mobility | |
Represented By: | David H. Cox |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: THE FAIRFAX COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS | |
Represented By: | Laura Schempf Gori |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.