Aimee Jacques v. Loretta Kelly
Petitioner - Appellant: AIMEE JOMAUR JACQUES
Respondent - Appellee: LORETTA K. KELLY, Warden
Case Number: 10-6226
Filed: February 10, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 8, 2010 Aimee Jacques v. Loretta Kelly

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 402880209 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998312741-2] Originating case number: 7:09-cv-00493-JLK-MFU Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998375770] [10-6226]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Aimee Jacques v. Loretta Kelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: AIMEE JOMAUR JACQUES
Represented By: Aimee Jomaur Jacques
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: LORETTA K. KELLY, Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?